Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMunro, Martin
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-14T13:53:09Z
dc.date.available2025-10-14T13:53:09Z
dc.date.issued2000
dc.identifierONIX_20251014T154955_9781839546907_13
dc.identifier.issn0957-0322
dc.identifier.urihttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/106498
dc.description.abstractThe current drive in Caribbean literary studies stresses similarities and points of convergence between the various islands of the archipelago and their authors, the fundamental aim of which is to move closer to an all-encompassing theory of Caribbeanness. Martin Munro challenges this movement, and through a study of the work of Aimé Césaire and René Depestre, proposes an alternative vision of the present and future of Caribbean literature. The main areas of inquiry are: how these two Caribbean writers construct their sense of themselves; how they relate to the Caribbean and to the wider world; and how they have been influenced by the historical and cultural particularities of their respective islands. Aimé Césaire's sense of self and of the Caribbean is essentially shaped around the circuit triangulaire, the model of Africa/Europe/Caribbean interdependencies, ultimately inherited from the time of the slave trade. Munro shows how Césaire views the Caribbean as a deeply traumatic, insubstantial space; how he looks to Africa for his lost sense of self; and how Europe is seen at once as the malevolent colonial power and also the home of poetry and learning. René Depestre's Caribbean 'shape' is quite different: Africa is relatively absent in Depestre's work; Europe is not presented as a threat; and Depestre, unlike Césaire, sees in the Caribbean an energy and a creativity brought about by the historical fusion of disparate cultures. An important factor in 'shaping' Depestre's model of Caribbeanness is his long exile from Haiti, and Depestre's experience of exile is analysed in detail. The combination of broad contextualization, diverse theoretical approaches, and close analysis of these important writers' work, produces a strong argument against attempts to view and read writing from the Caribbean as one literature. Difference and diversity, it is argued, predominate as Caribbean writing embraces the new century, and the whole notion of Caribbeanness undergoes further processes of highly creative splintering and reshaping.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.relation.ispartofseriesMHRA Texts and Dissertations
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::D Biography, Literature and Literary studies::DC Poetry
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::1 Place qualifiers::1K The Americas::1KJ Caribbean islands
dc.subject.classificationthema EDItEUR::3 Time period qualifiers::3M c 1500 onwards to present day::3MP 20th century, c 1900 to c 1999
dc.subject.otherCaribbean literature
dc.subject.otherCaribbean
dc.subject.otherCaribbeanness
dc.titleShaping and Reshaping the Caribbean
dc.title.alternativeThe Work of Aimé Césaire and René Depestre
dc.typebook
oapen.identifier.doi10.59860/td.b6c2c6a
oapen.relation.isPublishedBydf09d692-f384-443e-9989-84a1510c8d3d
oapen.relation.isbn9781839546907
oapen.relation.isbn1902653297
oapen.imprintTexts and Translations
oapen.series.number52
oapen.pages275
oapen.place.publicationCambridge


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record